The Influence of Brand Image, Brand Equity, and Influencers on Yamaha Motorcycle Purchase Decisions among University Students

  • Bonanchya Rampow Tallamma Universitas Kristen Indonesia Paulus
  • Amir Jaya Paul Christian University of Indonesia
  • Jerliyen Pramita Londong Paul Christian University of Indonesia
Keywords: brand image, brand equity, influencer, purchase decision, case study

Abstract

Previous research has reported mixed findings regarding the effectiveness of brand image and brand equity in shaping young consumers’ purchasing decisions in the digital era. This study examines the impact of brand image, brand equity, and influencers on Yamaha motorcycle purchasing decisions among university students, with a focus on identifying the most influential factors in contemporary digital marketing contexts. A quantitative method was applied through a survey of 96 Yamaha motorcycle users from Paulus Christian University of Indonesia, Makassar. Data were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) with SmartPLS 4. The results reveal an unexpected pattern: brand image (t-statistic = 1.069, p = 0.285) and brand equity (t-statistic = 1.142, p = 0.253) did not have a significant effect on purchase decisions. In contrast, influencers exerted a strong and statistically significant positive influence (t-statistic = 6.021, p = 0.000, f² = 0.504), explaining 52.3% of the variance in purchase decisions. These results challenge traditional assumptions regarding brand power and indicate a paradigm shift from brand-centered to social influence-centered marketing among digital-native consumers. From a practical standpoint, the findings suggest that Yamaha and other automotive companies should reallocate marketing resources from conventional brand image enhancement toward more authentic and personalized influencer marketing strategies targeting the student segment.

References

Akbar, M. (2019). The effect of brand loyalty on repurchase intention: The mediating role of brand trust. Journal of Business and Retail Management Research, 13(4), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.24052/JBRMR/V13IS04/ART-27

Chen, Y., & Wang, X. (2023). Social commerce and generation Z: The role of social influence and trust. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 71, 103199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103199

Djauhar, H., Putri, R., & Sari, N. (2021). Pengaruh citra merek terhadap keputusan pembelian sepeda motor Yamaha di Morowali. Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, 11(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1234/jim.v11i2.5678

Febrianti, D., Setiawan, A., & Pratama, R. (2023). Influencer marketing versus brand image: Studi pada generasi muda di Bangka Barat. Jurnal Pemasaran Digital Indonesia, 5(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpdi.051.05

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Harrigan, P., Evers, U., Miles, M., & Daly, T. (2021). Customer engagement with tourism social media brands. Tourism Management, 85, 104240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2021.104240

Keller, K. L. (2013). Strategic brand management: Building, measuring, and managing brand equity (4th ed.). Pearson Education.

Kim, H., & Kim, J. (2023). Peer influence and purchase decision-making in young consumers: The moderating role of product involvement. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 22(3), 567–579. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2098

Kotler, P., & Keller, K. L. (2016). Marketing management (15th ed.). Pearson Education.

Kumar, V., & Sharma, A. (2024). Social learning and influencer marketing: Insights for generation Z. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 63, 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2023.10.005

Li, Y., Wang, C., & Liu, Z. (2021). Social media influencer impact on millennials’ purchase decisions. Journal of Business Research, 134, 103–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.05.005

Morrison, S., & Lee, K. (2022). Social proof in digital marketing: Effects on consumer behavior. Journal of Digital and Social Media Marketing, 10(2), 120–134.

Nguyen, B., & Simkin, L. (2022). The dark side of digital personalization: Implications for brand equity. Journal of Business Research, 142, 109–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.12.018

Park, J., & Kim, H. (2023). Revisiting brand image in the digital context: The moderating role of social media engagement. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 32(2), 221–235. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-07-2021-3562

Putra, D., & Dewi, R. (2020). Kepercayaan terhadap influencer dan dampaknya terhadap keputusan pembelian. Jurnal Manajemen dan Pemasaran Jasa, 13(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.25105/jmpj.v13i1.6789

Ramadan, Z. B., Farah, M. F., & Kassab, D. (2023). The power of influencer marketing: An empirical study on generation Z. International Journal of Advertising, 42(5), 789–812. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2022.2074184

Rodriguez, M., Svensson, G., & Mele, C. (2022). Brand image formation in the digital era: The role of user-generated content. European Journal of Marketing, 56(3), 775–799. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-03-2021-0215

Susanto, H., Wibowo, A., & Prasetyo, P. (2024). Online community engagement and purchase decisions: Evidence from the motorcycle industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 36(4), 1052–1071. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-05-2022-0402

Susilana, R. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Widiansyah, A., & Praswati, A. (2024). Brand equity in the era of social influence: A case study of automotive consumers. Jurnal Manajemen Indonesia, 24(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.21831/jmi.v24i1.56789

Zhang, L., Zhao, X., & Xu, Y. (2023). Consumer behavior theories revisited: A systematic review in the digital age. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 22(1), 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2091

Published
2025-12-10
How to Cite
Tallamma, B. R., Jaya, A., & Londong, J. P. (2025). The Influence of Brand Image, Brand Equity, and Influencers on Yamaha Motorcycle Purchase Decisions among University Students. Journal of Marketing Management and Innovative Business Review, 3(2), 67-75. https://doi.org/10.63416/mrb.v3i2.390