Premature Hoisting Wire Rope Failure in Marine Deck Cranes: Investigating Diameter Mismatch, Two-Layer Spooling, and Sustainable Maintenance Strategies

  • Michael Rumopa Master of MV. Roslyn Raffles Ship Management PTE.LTD
Keywords: Service life of the hoisting wire rope, Diameter Incompatibility, Lifting Plans, Application of Two-Layer Spooling

Abstract

Hoisting wire ropes are critical components of marine deck crane systems, directly affecting operational safety, lifting efficiency, and equipment reliability. This study investigates the causes of premature hoisting wire rope failure on the deck crane of MV Roslyn and proposes maintenance strategies to extend its service life. A qualitative case study approach was conducted based on field observations from July 2025 to February 2026. Data were obtained through direct observations, inspections of wire ropes, drums, and sheaves, maintenance records, lifting plans, and technical documentation. The results indicate that the hoisting wire rope operated for only 200–300 hours, substantially below the expected service life of 1,300–1,500 hours. The main contributing factors were incompatibility between the wire rope diameter and the drum and sheave groove dimensions, the use of a two-layer spooling system, and inadequate lubrication practices. These conditions increased contact stress, friction, fatigue, deformation, and structural deterioration of the wire rope. To address these issues, corrective measures were implemented, including improving lubrication practices and recommending dimensional adjustments to the drum and sheave grooves, as well as adopting a single-layer spooling configuration. Enhanced lubrication alone increased wire rope service life to approximately 600–700 operating hours. Furthermore, predictive maintenance based on operating hours was found to support timely replacement planning while maintaining vessel operational efficiency.

References

Chang, X., Chen, X., Dong, Y., Lu, H., Tang, W., Zhang, Q., & Huang, K. (2022). Friction and Wear Behavior between Crane Wire Rope and Pulley under Different Contact Loads. In Lubricants (Vol. 10, Issue 12, p. 337). https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants10120337
Chang, X., Peng, Y., Zhu, Z., Gong, X., Yu, Z., Mi, Z., & Xu, C. (2019). Breaking failure analysis and finite element simulation of wear-out winding hoist wire rope. Engineering Failure Analysis, 95, 1–17. https://doi.org//10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.08.027
Chen, Y., Wang, S., Tan, H., Xu, J., He, Y., & Wang, S. (2024). Study on the tribological performance at the interface between a steel wire rope and groove during a twisting process. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 166, 104829. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnonlinmec.2024.104829
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed). SAGE Publications.
Guerra-Fuentes, L., Torres-López, M., Hernandez-Rodriguez, M. A. L., & Garcia-Sanchez, E. (2020). Failure analysis of steel wire rope used in overhead crane system. Engineering Failure Analysis, 118, 104893. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2020.104893
Hu, Z. H., Hu, J. Q., & Hu, Y. (2011). Experimental Study on Effect of Pulley Diameter and Lubricant Grease on Multi-Layer Winding Wire Rope’s Fatigue Endurance. Advanced Materials Research, 301–303, 1618–1623. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.301-303.1618
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2021). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications Inc.
Nabijou, S., & Hobbs, R. E. (1994). Fatigue of wire ropes bent over small sheaves. International Journal of Fatigue, 16(7), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-1123(94)90195-3
Peng, Y., Huang, K., Ma, C., Zhu, Z., Chang, X., Lu, H., Zhang, Q., & Xu, C. (2023). Friction and wear of multiple steel wires in a wire rope. Friction, 11(5), 763–784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40544-022-0665-y
Ridge, I. M. L., Chaplin, C. R., & Zheng, J. (2001). Effect of degradation and impaired quality on wire rope bending over sheave fatigue endurance. Engineering Failure Analysis, 8(2), 173–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1350-6307(99)00051-5
Singh, K., & Ahuja, I. S. (2015). An evaluation of transfusion of TQM-TPM implementation initiative in an Indian manufacturing industry. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, 21(2), 134–153. https://doi.org/10.1108/JQME-04-2013-0017
Vukelic, G., & Vizentin, G. (2017). Damage-Induced Stresses and Remaining Service Life Predictions of Wire Ropes. In Applied Sciences (Vol. 7, Issue 1, p. 107). https://doi.org/10.3390/app7010107
Xia, L., Li, G., Huang, K., Peng, Y., Tang, Y., Zhou, Z., Deng, R., & Chang, X. (2026). A Review of Tribological Behavior of Wire Ropes: Generation, Characteristics, Effects, and Protection. In Lubricants (Vol. 14, Issue 2, p. 62). https://doi.org/10.3390/lubricants14020062
Yin, R. . (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed). SAGE Publications.
Zhang, Q., Peng, Y., Zhu, Z., Chang, X., Lu, H., Zhou, Z., Jiang, F., Tang, W., & Chen, G. (2022). Tribo-failure characteristics of the multilayer winding hoisting wire ropes with two different structures under vibration. Engineering Failure Analysis, 140, 106538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2022.106538
Published
2026-06-10
How to Cite
Rumopa, M. (2026). Premature Hoisting Wire Rope Failure in Marine Deck Cranes: Investigating Diameter Mismatch, Two-Layer Spooling, and Sustainable Maintenance Strategies. Journal of Marketing Management and Innovative Business Review, 4(1), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.63416/mrb.v4i1.494